Many industry leaders are predicting a banner year for residential solar in 2015. The possible end of the ITC, not to mention the looming CA Net Metering Cap, means residential installation companies need to increase productivity. Implementing business models that unify project development phases will keep operations in-sync and on schedule.
Residential project development and design have always been evolving arts and key phases for any successful project. If predictions hold, installers will need to incorporate new innovations to prepare for the dramatic increase in demand for solar.
Combining remote site analysis, system design and site planning unifies project development phases. This approach synchronizes the value chain from the point of sale through installation.
Using Remote Design to Reduce Errors and Increase Efficiency
To evaluate a site and design a residential solar system, the installer must know the number of panels that can fit on every usable roof pitch (taking into account fire restrictions and all on- and off-roof obstructions), the roof slope and orientation for every usable pitch, and the shading impacts per panel. Only then will the installer and designer be able to give an accurate estimate of the annual kWh production to build the best system. Traditionally, most of this data would have been collected at the site–a costly and time consuming process which elevates the installers risk exposure. For the sake of expediency, manual site surveys are usually done with certain assumptions in mind and don’t attempt to be an all-inclusive analysis of the entire roof. With higher volumes, mistakes increase and are exacerbated by the number of people and touch points involved.
While larger installers might have the financial flexibility to absorb the consequences of these errors, many installers do not. At Bright Harvest, our approach eliminates many of these errors, providing accurate remote site analysis, system design and production estimates in as little as one business day. One comprehensive site model includes shading analysis, production estimate, system design and site plan, all in one. This approach gives PV designers maximum flexibility when running multiple design scenarios because they are never constrained by a single fixed data set that must be manually acquired on site or re-acquired if the original assumptions about the system locations change.
Taking Advantage of Remote Site Analysis for Residential Solar
In the past, third party owners (TPOs) have forced installers to validate each site with manually collected shading data before funding. While this approach has arguably propelled the growth of residential solar, it is not an approach that can easily accommodate expanding volume. Funders who insist on this requirement handicap the installer and themselves by taking away the benefits of accurate data at the earliest stages of the project by dismissing these innovations without consideration. This requirement also locks the installer into a higher cost structure that puts them at a competitive disadvantage.
Installation companies realize the risk exposure and monetary inefficiencies of dispatching personnel to perform an onsite analysis. A growing number of TPOs are discovering advantages available to them as well. A per module shading analysis creates a more detailed picture about panel placement and production from the start. Allowing funders to customize deals and set tighter criteria for production to system size ratios. Integrating the analysis and the site plan improves the crews ability to accurately position the panels on the roof. This reduces mistakes in the field that can impact production and insures the system is installed based on the analysis.
Unifying the Process and Increasing Efficiency to Meet Demand
Everyone involved in the installation cycle, from sales to installation crews, are responsible for making this complex proposition a reality on the roof. Our goal at Bright Harvest is to maximize efficiencies through accurate remote designs that streamline the solar project development process. We aim to reduce costs, eliminate guesswork and increase accuracy when qualifying projects and designing PV systems. After evaluating the accuracy of our designs in the field and validating them against traditional onsite methods, funders are quick to realize the benefits to installers and themselves. A proposed PV design should inform and have value for all stakeholders from the start.
From point of sale to installation, everyone should have confidence in the PV design. Until as recently as a few years ago, installers had no choice when evaluating solar sites except to rely on a multi-step, multi-touch process. However, now the entire process can be unified. Streamlining the analysis, design and the site plan creates a project development system that is relational. The site plan can then be incorporated into the permit set or go directly to the installation crew, harmonizing all phases of project development with the entire value chain.
With one report that covers all the details, the salesperson will possess the best design from the designer and an accurate estimate of system size and the annual kWh production. The salesperson is at a huge advantage when the choices that underlie the design are informed by a per panel analysis and illustrated in a way that can be easily understood by the client, reducing misunderstandings. This increases client engagement in the design process allowing them to make informed decisions about system size and layout vs. production.
The challenges installers face, from changing equipment pricing and availability, to rearranging installation schedules, are too numerous to list. The last thing they should have to worry about is visiting every potential job site, or re-visiting the project site because the design changed. Any guesswork, overly optimistic assumptions or miscommunications on the front end can be problematic or disastrous down the line, but they can be avoided by streamlining the process and using accurate analysis from the beginning.
We often hear about the need to reduce residential solar soft costs, but until now the only tools available to assess and design residential solar have taken a do-it-yourself approach that don’t attempt to give installers all the answers they need to design a system. At Bright Harvest we’ve taken a different approach to remote system design that’s comprehensive and accountable.
2015 will test many residential installation companies, both large and small. Everyone in the solar industry should be feeling a renewed sense of urgency. The pressure from increased deal volume will have the potential to showcase residential solars strengths and expose its weaknesses. The companies that look for effective, comprehensive strategies that leverage current technologies are the ones who will lead the way in 2015, and into the future.
This article was authored by Joel Lusk, CEO and co-founder of Bright Harvest Solar.
Solar Power World